N. Adler, M. Elmquist, and F. , The challenge of managing boundary-spanning research activities: Experiences from the Swedish context, Research Policy, vol.38, issue.7, pp.1136-1149, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2009.05.001

B. Bozeman, Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory, Research Policy, vol.29, issue.4-5, pp.4-5, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00093-1

B. Bozeman and M. , Impacts of grants and contracts on academic researchers??? interactions with industry, Research Policy, vol.36, issue.5, pp.694-707, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.007

M. Callon, Is Science a Public Good? Fifth Mullins Lecture, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, 23 March 1993, Science, Technology & Human Values, vol.19, issue.4, pp.395-425, 1995.
DOI : 10.1177/016224399401900401

C. Cañibano, J. Otamendi, and I. , Measuring and assessing researcher mobility from CV analysis: the case of the Ram??n y Cajal programme in Spain, Research Evaluation, vol.17, issue.1, pp.17-31, 2008.
DOI : 10.3152/095820208X292797

B. Clark, The academic profession: National, disciplinary, and institutional settings, 1987.

B. Clark, Influences and conflicts of federal policies in academic?industrial scientific collaboration, The Journal of Technology, vol.36, issue.5, pp.514-545, 2011.

J. Cunningham, P. O-'reilly, C. O-'kane, and V. Mangematin, Managerial Challenges of Publicly Funded Principal Investigators, Technology Transfer Society Annual Conference, 2012.

D. 'este, P. , and M. , Why do academic engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations, The Journal of Technology, vol.36, pp.316-339, 2010.

F. Dany, S. Louvel, and A. , Academic careers: The limits of the ???boundaryless approach??? and the power of promotion scripts, Human Relations, vol.23, issue.4, pp.971-996, 2011.
DOI : 10.1177/0018726710393537
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00667812

J. Dietz and B. , Academic careers, patents, and productivity: industry experience as scientific and technical human capital, Research Policy, vol.34, issue.3, pp.349-367, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.008

I. Drejer and B. &jorgensen, PUBLIC-PRIVATE COLLABORATION ON KNOWLEDGE GENERATION AND APPLICATION IN NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS, pp.285-308, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/S0737-1071(04)08012-6

J. Duberley, L. Cohen, and M. , Constructing scientific careers: change continuity and context. Organization Studies27, pp.1131-1151, 2006.
DOI : 10.1177/0170840606064105

K. Eisenhardt, Building theories from case study research, pp.532-550, 1989.

K. Eisenhardt and M. &graebner, THEORY BUILDING FROM CASES: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES., Academy of Management Journal, vol.50, issue.1, pp.25-32, 2007.
DOI : 10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160888

A. Geuna and L. Nesta, University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence, Research Policy, vol.35, issue.6, pp.790-807, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.005

A. Glassman, R. Moore, G. Rossy, K. Neupert, N. Napier et al., Academic entrepreneurship -Views on balancing the Acropolis and the Agora, Journal of Management, vol.12, issue.4, pp.353-374, 2003.

D. Göktepe-hultenet and P. , Inventing and patenting activities of scientists: in the expectation of money or reputation?, The Journal of Technology, vol.35, issue.4, pp.401-423, 2010.

D. Guston and K. , The Fragile Contract: University Science and the Federal Government, 1994.

L. Hessels and H. &van-lente, Re-thinking new knowledge production: A literature review and a research agenda, Research Policy, vol.37, issue.4, pp.740-760, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.008

S. Jain, G. George, and M. , Academics or entrepreneurs? Investigating role identity modification of university scientists involved in commercialization activity, Research Policy, vol.38, issue.6, pp.922-935, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2009.02.007

P. Joly and V. , Profile of public laboratories, industrial partnerships and organisation of R & D: the dynamics of industrial relationships in a large research organisation, Research Policy, vol.25, issue.6, pp.901-922, 1996.
DOI : 10.1016/0048-7333(96)00882-7
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00422575

M. Klofstenet and D. &jones-evans, Comparing Academic Entrepreneurship in Europe ? The Case of Sweden and Ireland, Small Business Economics, vol.14, issue.4, pp.75-96, 2000.

K. Kreeger, Researchers setting up labs must learn skills on the fly, The Scientist, vol.11, issue.5, pp.14-15, 1997.

D. Libaers, M. Meyer, and A. &geuna, The Role of University Spinout Companies in an Emerging Technology: The Case of Nanotechnology, The Journal of Technology Transfer, vol.33, issue.1, pp.443-450, 2006.
DOI : 10.1007/s10961-006-0005-9

A. Link, The exploitation of publicly funded technology, The Journal of Technology, vol.37, issue.3, pp.375-383, 2012.

C. Lyall, A. Bruce, J. Firn, M. Firn, and J. , Assessing end-use relevance of public sector research organisations, Research Policy, vol.33, issue.1, pp.73-87, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00090-8

V. Mangematin, From sectoral to horizontal public policies: the evolution of support for biotechnology in Europe, 1994-2001, Science and Public Policy, vol.31, issue.5, pp.397-406, 1994.
DOI : 10.3152/147154304781779895
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00424320

V. Mangematin and R. S. , The two faces of PhD students: management of early careers of French PhDs in life sciences, Science and Public Policy, vol.30, issue.6, pp.405-414, 2003.
DOI : 10.3152/147154303781780209

J. Melkers and X. F. , Boundary-spanning in emerging technology research: determinants of funding success for academic scientists, The Journal of Technology Transfer, vol.36, issue.6, pp.251-270, 2012.
DOI : 10.1007/s10961-010-9173-8

R. Merton, Social Theory and Social Structure, 1968.

M. Miles and . &aubep-amhb, Qualitative Data Analysis, Sage, 1994.

M. Nedeva, L. Georghiou, and P. , Benefactors or Beneficiary?The Role of Industry in the Support of University Research Equipment, The Journal of Technology, vol.24, issue.2-3, pp.139-147, 1999.

J. Owen-smith and W. , Carrers and Contradictions: Faculty Responses to the Transformation of knowledge end its uses in th Life Science. The Transformation of work 10, p.46, 2001.

J. Owen-smith and W. , The expanding role of university patenting in the life sciences: assessing the importance of experience and connectivity, Research Policy, vol.32, issue.9, pp.1695-1711, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00045-3

C. Palmberg, The transfer and commercialisation of nanotechnology: a comparative analysis of university and company researchers, The Journal of Technology Transfer, vol.20, issue.3, pp.631-652, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/s10961-007-9059-6

D. Preston, The University in Crisis. Rodopi: Amsterdam, 2002.

P. Tang and B. , The benefits from publicly funded research, 2007.

M. Roach and H. , A Taste for Science? PhD Scientist's Academic Orientation and SelfSelection into Research Careers in Industry, Research, vol.39, issue.3, pp.422-434, 2010.

S. Rosser and J. Chameau, Institutionalization, Sustainability, and Repeatability of ADVANCE for Institutional Transformation, The Journal of Technology Transfer, vol.16, issue.5, pp.335-344, 2006.
DOI : 10.1007/s10961-006-7205-1

R. Rubenstein, A. Schwartz, and L. , Better than Raw: A Guide to Measuring Organizational Performance with Adjusted Performance Measures, Public Administration Review, vol.278, issue.6, pp.607-615, 2003.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.285.24.3116

T. Shinn, Hiérarchies des chercheurs et formes de recherche Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, pp.2-22, 1988.

D. Siegel, D. Waldam, and A. , Assessing the Impact of organisational practices on the relative productivity of University transfer offices: An exploratory case, Research, vol.32, issue.1, pp.27-48, 2003.

N. Siggelkow, Persuasion with case studies, Revista Eletr??nica de Estrat??gia & Neg??cios, vol.1, issue.1, pp.20-24, 2007.
DOI : 10.19177/reen.v1e120081-9

P. Stephan, Robert K. Merton's perspective on priority and the provision of the public good knowledge, Scientometrics, vol.60, issue.1, pp.81-87, 2004.
DOI : 10.1023/B:SCIE.0000027311.17226.70

J. Thursby, R. Jensen, and M. , Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of university licensing : a survey of major U.S. universities, The journal of Technology, vol.26, issue.12, pp.59-72, 2001.

J. Thursby and M. Thursby, Has the Bayh-Dole act compromised basic research?, Research Policy, vol.40, issue.8, pp.1077-1083, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.009

P. Vincett, The economic impacts of academic spin-off companies, and their implications for public policy, Research Policy, vol.39, issue.6, pp.736-747, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.001

R. Yin, Case Study Research : Design and Methods, 2009.