S. Albert and E. Adams, The hybrid identity of law firms Corporate and Organizational Identities: Integrating Strategy, Marketing, Communication and Organizational Perspectives, pp.35-50, 2002.

S. Albert and D. A. Whetten, Organizational identity, Research in Organizational Behavior, vol.17, pp.263-95, 1985.

T. T. Aldridge and D. Audretsch, The Bayh-Dole Act and scientist entrepreneurship, Research Policy, vol.40, issue.8, pp.1058-67, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2011.04.006

T. C. Ambos, K. Mäkelä, J. Birkinshaw, and P. D-'este, When Does University Research Get Commercialized? Creating Ambidexterity in Research Institutions, Journal of Management Studies, vol.48, issue.8, pp.1424-1471, 2008.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00804.x

B. Ashforth and B. Gibbs, The Double-Edge of Organizational Legitimation, Organization Science, vol.1, issue.2, pp.177-94, 1990.
DOI : 10.1287/orsc.1.2.177

B. Ashforth, S. Harrison, and K. Corley, Identification in Organizations: An Examination of Four Fundamental Questions, Journal of Management, vol.67, issue.8, pp.325-74, 2008.
DOI : 10.1177/0149206308316059

B. Ashforth and R. Humphrey, Emotional labor in service roles: the influence of identity, Academy of Management Review, vol.18, pp.88-115, 1993.

B. Ashforth and S. Johnson, Which hat to wear? The relative salience of multiple identities in organizational contexts, Social Identity Processes in Organizational Contexts, pp.31-48, 2001.

N. Baldini, R. Grimaldi, and M. Sobrero, Institutional changes and the commercialization of academic knowledge: A study of Italian universities??? patenting activities between 1965 and 2002, Research Policy, vol.35, issue.4, pp.518-550, 1965.
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2006.01.004

J. Bercovitz and M. Feldman, Academic Entrepreneurs: Organizational Change at the Individual Level, Organization Science, vol.19, issue.1, pp.69-89, 2008.
DOI : 10.1287/orsc.1070.0295

A. Bitektine, Toward a Theory of Social Judgments of Organizations: The Case of Legitimacy, Reputation, and Status, Academy of Management Review, vol.36, issue.1, pp.151-79, 2011.
DOI : 10.5465/amr.2009.0382

D. Blumenthal, E. G. Campbell, N. Causino, and K. S. Louis, Participation of Life-Science Faculty in Research Relationships with Industry, New England Journal of Medicine, vol.335, issue.23, pp.1734-1773, 1996.
DOI : 10.1056/NEJM199612053352305

B. Freitas, I. M. Geuna, A. Rossi, and F. , The governance of university-industry knowledge transfer: why small firms do (not) develop institutional collaborations? Research Policy, pp.50-62, 2013.

D. Boehm and T. Hogan, ???A jack of all trades???: the role of PIs in the establishment and management of collaborative networks in scientific knowledge commercialisation, The Journal of Technology Transfer, vol.48, issue.1, pp.134-183, 2014.
DOI : 10.1007/s10961-012-9273-8

B. Bozeman, Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory, Research Policy, vol.29, issue.4-5, pp.627-55, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00093-1

M. B. Brewer, The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol.17, issue.5, pp.475-82, 1991.
DOI : 10.1177/0146167291175001

S. L. Brickson, Organizational Identity Orientation: Forging a Link between Organizational Identity and Organizations' Relations with Stakeholders, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.50, issue.4, pp.576-609, 2005.
DOI : 10.2189/asqu.50.4.576

A. Brown and S. Toyoki, Identity Work and Legitimacy, Organization Studies, vol.1, issue.7, pp.875-96, 2013.
DOI : 10.1086/228668

P. Burke, The Self: Measurement Requirements from an Interactionist Perspective, Social Psychology Quarterly, vol.43, issue.1, pp.18-29, 1980.
DOI : 10.2307/3033745

V. Bush, Science: The Endless Frontier; A Report to the President by Vannevar Bush, Director of the Office of Scientific Research and Development, Government Printing Office, 1945.

E. G. Campbell, J. S. Weissman, N. Causino, and D. Blumenthal, Data withholding in academic medicine: characteristics of faculty denied access to research results and biomaterials, Research Policy, vol.29, issue.2, pp.303-315, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00068-2

D. Chaney and R. Marshall, Social legitimacy versus distinctiveness: Mapping the place of consumers in the mental representations of managers in an institutionalized environment, Journal of Business Research, vol.66, issue.9, pp.1550-58, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.09.018

W. Chapple, A. Lockett, D. Siegel, and M. Wright, Assessing the relative performance of U.K. university technology transfer offices: parametric and non-parametric evidence, Research Policy, vol.34, issue.3, pp.369-84, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.007

S. Chermak and A. Weiss, Maintaining legitimacy using external communication strategies: An analysis of police-media relations, Journal of Criminal Justice, vol.33, issue.5, pp.501-513, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2005.06.001

B. Clarysse and N. Moray, A process study of entrepreneurial team formation: the case of a research-based spin-off, Journal of Business Venturing, vol.19, issue.1, pp.55-79, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00113-1

B. Clarysse, V. Tartari, and A. Salter, The impact of entrepreneurial capacity, experience and organizational support on academic entrepreneurship, Research Policy, vol.40, issue.8, pp.1084-93, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.010

M. G. Colombo and M. Delmastro, How effective are technology incubators?, Research Policy, vol.31, issue.7, pp.1103-1125, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00178-0

J. A. Colyvas, From divergent meanings to common practices: The early institutionalization of technology transfer in the life sciences at Stanford University, Research Policy, vol.36, issue.4, pp.456-76, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2007.02.019

J. A. Colyvas and S. Jonsson, Ubiquity and Legitimacy: Disentangling Diffusion and Institutionalization, Sociological Theory, vol.42, issue.1, pp.27-53, 2011.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01386.x

J. A. Colyvas and W. W. Powell, Roads to Institutionalization: The Remaking of Boundaries between Public and Private Science, Research in Organizational Behavior, vol.27, pp.305-53, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/S0191-3085(06)27008-4

J. A. Colyvas and W. W. Powell, From Vulnerable to Venerated: The Institutionalization of Academic Entrepreneurship in the Life Sciences, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, pp.219-59, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/S0733-558X(06)25007-9

C. Daraio, A. Bonaccorsi, A. Geuna, B. Lepori, L. Bach et al., The European university landscape: A micro characterization based on evidence from the Aquameth project, Research Policy, vol.40, issue.1, pp.148-64, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2010.10.009

P. Dasgupta and P. A. David, Toward a new economics of science, Research Policy, vol.23, pp.487-521, 1994.

D. 'este, P. Perkmann, and M. , Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations, Journal of Technology Transfer, vol.36, pp.316-355, 2011.

K. Debackere and R. Veugelers, The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links, Research Policy, vol.34, issue.3, pp.321-363, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2004.12.003

M. Decter, D. Bennett, and M. Leseure, University to business technology transfer???UK and USA comparisons, Technovation, vol.27, issue.3, pp.145-55, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.technovation.2006.02.001

D. L. Deephouse, To be different, or to be the same? It???s a question (and theory) of strategic balance, Strategic Management Journal, vol.16, issue.2, pp.147-66, 1999.
DOI : 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199902)20:2<147::AID-SMJ11>3.0.CO;2-Q

J. L. Denis, A. Langley, and L. Rouleau, Strategizing in pluralistic contexts: Rethinking theoretical frames, Human Relations, vol.1, issue.1, pp.179-215, 2007.
DOI : 10.1177/0018726707075288

D. Gregorio, D. Shane, and S. , Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others?, Research Policy, vol.32, issue.2, pp.209-236, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00097-5

J. Dowling and J. Pfeffer, Organizational Legitimacy: Social Values and Organizational Behavior, The Pacific Sociological Review, vol.18, issue.1, pp.122-158, 1975.
DOI : 10.2307/1388226

I. Drori, B. Honig, and M. Wright, Transnational Entrepreneurship: An Emergent Field of Study, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol.49, issue.2, pp.1001-1023, 2009.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00332.x

M. Dunn and C. Jones, Institutional Logics and Institutional Pluralism: The Contestation of Care and Science Logics in Medical Education, 1967???2005, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.353, issue.1, pp.114-163, 1967.
DOI : 10.2189/asqu.2010.55.1.114

J. E. Dutton and J. M. Dukerich, KEEPING AN EYE ON THE MIRROR: IMAGE AND IDENTITY IN ORGANIZATIONAL ADAPTATION., Academy of Management Journal, vol.34, issue.3, pp.517-54, 1991.
DOI : 10.2307/256405

J. E. Dutton, J. M. Dukerich, and C. V. Harquail, Organizational Images and Member Identification, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.39, issue.2, pp.239-63, 1994.
DOI : 10.2307/2393235

E. M. Eisenberg, Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication, Communication Monographs, vol.60, issue.3, pp.227-269, 1984.
DOI : 10.1080/03637758409390197

K. M. Eisenhardt, Agency theory: an assessment and review. The Academy of, Management Review, vol.14, pp.57-74, 1989.
DOI : 10.2307/258191

K. M. Eisenhardt and M. E. Graebner, THEORY BUILDING FROM CASES: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES., Academy of Management Journal, vol.50, issue.1, pp.25-32, 2007.
DOI : 10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160888

K. D. Elsbach and R. M. Kramer, Members' Responses to Organizational Identity Threats: Encountering and Countering the Business Week Rankings, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.41, issue.3, pp.442-76, 1996.
DOI : 10.2307/2393938

K. D. Elsbach and R. M. Kramer, ASSESSING CREATIVITY IN HOLLYWOOD PITCH MEETINGS: EVIDENCE FOR A DUAL-PROCESS MODEL OF CREATIVITY JUDGMENTS., Academy of Management Journal, vol.46, issue.3, pp.283-301, 2003.
DOI : 10.2307/30040623

H. Etzkowitz, Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science, Minerva, vol.21, issue.2-3, pp.198-233, 1983.
DOI : 10.1007/BF01097964

H. Etzkowitz, Incubation of incubators: innovation as a triple helix of university-industry-government networks, Science and Public Policy, vol.29, issue.2, pp.115-143, 2002.
DOI : 10.3152/147154302781781056

H. Etzkowitz, Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations, Social Science Information, vol.42, issue.3, pp.293-337, 2003.
DOI : 10.1177/05390184030423002

H. Etzkowitz and L. Leydesdorff, Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations, 1997.

H. Etzkowitz and L. Leydesdorff, The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and ???Mode 2??? to a Triple Helix of university???industry???government relations, Research Policy, vol.29, issue.2, pp.109-132, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4

J. Fagerberg, H. Landstrom, and B. R. Martin, Exploring the emerging knowledge base of ???the knowledge society???, Research Policy, vol.41, issue.7, pp.1121-1152, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.007

M. P. Feldman and J. Francis, Fortune Favours the Prepared Region: The Case of Entrepreneurship and the Capitol Region Biotechnology Cluster, European Planning Studies, vol.11, issue.7, pp.765-88, 2003.
DOI : 10.1080/0965431032000121337

I. Feller, University Patent and Technology-Licensing Strategies, Educational Policy, vol.4, issue.4, pp.327-367, 1990.
DOI : 10.1177/0895904890004004005

E. Ferlie, L. Fitzgerald, M. Wood, and C. Hawkins, THE NONSPREAD OF INNOVATIONS: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF PROFESSIONALS., Academy of Management Journal, vol.48, issue.1, pp.117-151, 2005.
DOI : 10.5465/AMJ.2005.15993150

J. Friedman and J. Silberman, University technology transfer: do incentives, management, and location matter, The Journal of Technology Transfer, vol.28, issue.1, pp.17-30, 2003.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1021674618658

W. L. Gardner and B. J. Avolio, The charismatic relationship: a dramaturgical perspective, Academy of Management Review, vol.23, issue.1, pp.32-58, 1998.

E. George and P. Chattopadhyay, One Foot in Each Camp: The Dual Identification of Contract Workers, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.50, issue.1, pp.68-99, 2005.
DOI : 10.2189/asqu.2005.50.1.68

D. Gioia, M. Schultz, and K. G. Corley, Organizational identity, image, and adaptive instability, Academy of Management Review, vol.25, issue.1, pp.63-81, 2000.

M. Glynn, P. Barr, and M. Dacin, Pluralism and the problem of variety, Academy of Management Review, vol.25, pp.726-760, 2000.

M. A. Glynn and C. Navis, Categories, Identities, and Cultural Classification: Moving Beyond a Model of Categorical Constraint, Journal of Management Studies, vol.104, issue.6, pp.1124-1161, 2013.
DOI : 10.1111/joms.12023

D. Göktepe-hultén, Academic inventors and research groups: entrepreneurial cultures at universities, Science and Public Policy, vol.35, issue.9, pp.657-66, 2008.
DOI : 10.3152/030234208X363196

B. Goldfarb and M. Henrekson, Bottom-up versus top-down policies towards the commercialization of university intellectual property, Research Policy, vol.32, issue.4, pp.639-58, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00034-3

L. R. Gomez-mejia and D. B. Balkin, DETERMINANTS OF FACULTY PAY: AN AGENCY THEORY PERSPECTIVE., Academy of Management Journal, vol.35, issue.5, pp.921-55, 1992.
DOI : 10.2307/256535

E. Goodrick and T. Reay, Florence Nightingale Endures: Legitimizing a New Professional Role Identity, Journal of Management Studies, vol.23, issue.1, pp.55-84, 2010.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00860.x

C. Haeussler and J. A. Colyvas, Breaking the Ivory Tower: Academic Entrepreneurship in the Life Sciences in UK and Germany, Research Policy, vol.40, issue.1, pp.41-54, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.012

D. C. Hambrick and M. J. Chen, New Academic Fields as Admittance-Seeking Social Movements: The Case of Strategic Management, Academy of Management Review, vol.33, issue.1, pp.32-54, 2008.
DOI : 10.5465/AMR.2008.27745027

B. Hinings and R. Greenwood, The normative prescription of organizations, Institutional Patterns and Organizations, pp.53-70, 1988.

G. Hsu and M. T. Hannan, Identities, Genres, and Organizational Forms, Organization Science, vol.16, issue.5, pp.474-90, 2005.
DOI : 10.1287/orsc.1050.0151

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=

K. G. Huang and F. E. Murray, Does Patent Strategy Shape the Long-Run Supply of Public Knowledge? Evidence from Human Genetics, Academy of Management Journal, vol.52, issue.6, pp.1193-221, 2009.
DOI : 10.5465/AMJ.2009.47084665

C. S. Hunt and H. E. Aldrich, Why Even Rodney Dangerfield Has a Home Page: Legitimizing the World Wide Web as a Medium for Commercial Endeavors, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, 1996.

S. Jain and G. George, Technology transfer offices as institutional entrepreneurs: the case of Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation and human embryonic stem cells, Industrial and Corporate Change, vol.16, issue.4, pp.535-67, 2007.
DOI : 10.1093/icc/dtm017

S. Jain, G. George, and M. Maltarich, Academics or entrepreneurs? Investigating role identity modification of university scientists involved in commercialization activity, Research Policy, vol.38, issue.6, pp.922-957, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2009.02.007

P. Jarzabkowski and E. Fenton, Strategizing and Organizing in Pluralistic Contexts, Long Range Planning, vol.39, issue.6, pp.631-679, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.lrp.2006.11.002

M. C. Jensen and W. H. Meckling, Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure, Journal of Financial Economics, vol.3, issue.4, pp.305-60, 1976.
DOI : 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

R. A. Jensen, J. G. Thursby, and M. C. Thursby, Disclosure and licensing of University inventions: ???The best we can do with the s**t we get to work with???, International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol.21, issue.9, pp.1271-300, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S0167-7187(03)00083-3

R. Jepperson, Institutions, institutional effects and institutionalism The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, pp.143-63, 1991.

H. J. Jung and J. J. Lee, The impacts of science and technology policy interventions on university research: evidence from the U, S. National Nanotechnology Initiative. Research Policy, vol.43, pp.74-91, 2014.

M. Kenney and W. R. Goe, The role of social embeddedness in professorial entrepreneurship: a comparison of electrical engineering and computer science at UC Berkeley and Stanford, Research Policy, vol.33, issue.5, pp.691-707, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2003.11.001

G. M. Kistruck, C. J. Sutter, R. B. Lount-jr, and B. R. Smith, Mitigating Principal-Agent Problems in Base-of-the-Pyramid Markets: An Identity Spillover Perspective, Academy of Management Journal, vol.56, issue.3, pp.659-82, 2013.
DOI : 10.5465/amj.2011.0336

M. Kraatz and E. Block, Organizational implications of institutional pluralism The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, pp.243-75, 2008.

G. E. Kreiner, E. C. Hollensbe, and M. L. Sheep, Balancing Borders and Bridges: Negotiating the Work-Home Interface via Boundary Work Tactics, Academy of Management Journal, vol.52, issue.4, pp.704-734, 2009.
DOI : 10.5465/AMJ.2009.43669916

A. Lam, From ???Ivory Tower Traditionalists??? to ???Entrepreneurial Scientists???? Academic Scientists in Fuzzy University-Industry Boundaries, SSRN Electronic Journal, vol.40, pp.307-347, 2010.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.1800683

B. Latour and S. Woolgar, Laboratory life: the social construction of scientific facts, Sage, 1979.

A. N. Link, D. S. Siegel, and B. Bozeman, An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal university technology transfer, Industrial and Corporate Change, vol.16, issue.4, pp.641-55, 2007.
DOI : 10.1093/icc/dtm020

A. Link, N. Siegel, and S. Donald, University-based technology initiatives: Quantitative and qualitative evidence, Research Policy, vol.34, issue.3, pp.253-260, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.005

R. S. Livengood and R. K. Reger, THAT'S OUR TURF! IDENTITY DOMAINS AND COMPETITIVE DYNAMICS., Academy of Management Review, vol.35, issue.1, pp.48-66, 2010.
DOI : 10.5465/AMR.2010.45577794

A. Lockett and M. Wright, Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies, Research Policy, vol.34, issue.7, pp.1043-57, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.006

K. S. Louis, D. Blumenthal, M. E. Gluck, and M. A. Stoto, Entrepreneurs in Academe: An Exploration of Behaviors among Life Scientists, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.34, issue.1, pp.110-131, 1989.
DOI : 10.2307/2392988

M. Lounsbury and M. A. Glynn, Cultural entrepreneurship: stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources, Strategic Management Journal, vol.54, issue.6-7, pp.545-64, 2001.
DOI : 10.1002/smj.188

V. Mangematin, . Cunningham, and P. O-'reilly, PIs as boundary spanners, science and market shapers, The Journal of Technology Transfer, vol.39, issue.6, pp.1-10, 2014.
DOI : 10.1007/s10961-012-9270-y

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00794938

G. D. Markman, P. Gianiodis, and P. Phan, Supply-Side Innovation and Technology Commercialization, Journal of Management Studies, vol.88, issue.4, pp.625-674, 2009.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00835.x

G. D. Markman, P. T. Gianiodis, P. H. Phan, and D. B. Balkin, Innovation speed: Transferring university technology to market, Research Policy, vol.34, issue.7, pp.1058-75, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.007

G. D. Markman, D. S. Siegel, and M. Wright, Research and Technology Commercialization, Journal of Management Studies, vol.93, issue.8, pp.1401-1424, 2008.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00803.x

B. Martin, Are universities and university research under threat? Towards an evolutionary model of university speciation, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol.36, issue.3, pp.543-565, 2012.
DOI : 10.1093/cje/bes006

G. Mcnamara, D. L. Deephouse, and R. A. Luce, Competitive positioning within and across a strategic group structure: the performance of core, secondary, and solitary firms, Strategic Management Journal, vol.16, issue.2, pp.161-81, 2003.
DOI : 10.1002/smj.289

R. Merton, Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science, American Sociological Review, vol.22, issue.6, pp.635-59, 1957.
DOI : 10.2307/2089193

R. K. Merton, The Sociology of Science, Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, 1973.

M. B. Miles and A. M. Huberman, Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, 1994.

D. C. Mowery and A. A. Ziedonis, Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh???Dole act in the United States, Research Policy, vol.31, issue.3, pp.399-418, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00116-0

F. Murray, The Oncomouse That Roared: Hybrid Exchange Strategies as a Source of Distinction at the Boundary of Overlapping Institutions, American Journal of Sociology, vol.116, issue.2, pp.348-88, 2010.
DOI : 10.1086/653599

A. Muscio, What drives the university use of technology transfer offices? Evidence from Italy, The Journal of Technology Transfer, vol.32, issue.1???2, pp.181-202, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/s10961-009-9121-7

P. Mustar, M. Renault, M. G. Colombo, E. Piva, M. Fontes et al., Conceptualising the heterogeneity of research-based spin-offs: A multi-dimensional taxonomy, Research Policy, vol.35, issue.2, pp.289-308, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2005.11.001

P. Mustar and M. Wright, Convergence or path dependency in policies to foster the creation of university spin-off firms? A comparison of France and the United Kingdom, The Journal of Technology Transfer, vol.35, issue.4, pp.42-65, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/s10961-009-9113-7

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00480980

C. Navis and M. Glynn, How New Market Categories Emerge: Temporal Dynamics of Legitimacy, Identity, and Entrepreneurship in Satellite Radio, 1990???2005, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.104, issue.2, pp.439-71, 1990.
DOI : 10.1177/001316446002000104

C. Navis and M. Glynn, Legitimate distinctiveness and the entrepreneurial identity: influence on investor judgments of new venture plausibility, Academy of Management Review, vol.36, pp.479-99, 2011.

R. R. Nelson, The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research, Journal of Political Economy, vol.67, issue.3, pp.297-306, 1959.
DOI : 10.1086/258177

R. R. Nelson, The market economy, and the scientific commons, Research Policy, vol.33, issue.3, pp.455-71, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2003.09.008

O. 'donoghue, T. Punch, and K. , Qualitative Educational Research in Action: Doing and Reflecting, 2003.

C. Oliver, STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO INSTITUTIONAL PROCESSES, Academy of Management Review, vol.16, issue.1, pp.145-79, 1991.
DOI : 10.5465/AMR.1991.4279002

O. Shea, R. P. Allen, T. J. Chevalier, A. Roche, and F. , Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities, Research Policy, vol.34, issue.7, pp.994-1009, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.011

O. Shea, R. P. Allen, T. J. O-'gorman, C. Roche, and F. , Delineating the anatomy of an entrepreneurial university: the MIT experience, R & D Management, vol.37, pp.1-16, 2007.

J. Pfeffer and G. Salancik, The External Control of Organizations, 1978.

P. Phan and D. S. Siegel, The Effectiveness of University Technology Transfer: Lessons Learned, Managerial and Policy Implications, and the Road Forward, SSRN Electronic Journal, vol.2, issue.2, pp.77-144, 2006.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.900605

J. B. Powers and P. Mcdougall, University start-up formation and technology licensing with firms that go public: a resource-based view of academic entrepreneurship, Journal of Business Venturing, vol.20, issue.3, pp.291-311, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.008

M. G. Pratt, The Good, the Bad, and the Ambivalent: Managing Identification among Amway Distributors, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.45, issue.3, pp.456-93, 2000.
DOI : 10.2307/2667106

M. G. Pratt and P. O. Foreman, Classifying managerial responses to multiple organizational identities, Academy of Management Review, vol.25, issue.1, pp.18-42, 2000.

M. G. Pratt and A. Rafaeli, ORGANIZATIONAL DRESS AS A SYMBOL OF MULTILAYERED SOCIAL INDENTITIES., Academy of Management Journal, vol.40, issue.4, pp.862-98, 1997.
DOI : 10.2307/256951

H. Rao, G. F. Davis, and A. Ward, Embeddedness, Social Identity and Mobility: Why Firms Leave the NASDAQ and Join the New York Stock Exchange, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.45, issue.2, pp.268-92, 2000.
DOI : 10.2307/2667072

J. A. Rosa, J. F. Porac, J. Runser-spanjol, and M. S. Saxon, Sociocognitive Dynamics in a Product Market, Journal of Marketing, vol.63, pp.64-77, 1999.
DOI : 10.2307/1252102

E. Rasmussen, S. Mosey, and M. Wright, The influence of university departments on the evolution of entrepreneurial competencies in spin-off ventures, Research Policy, vol.43, issue.1, pp.92-106, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.007

F. T. Rothaermel, S. Agung, and L. Jiang, University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature, Industrial and Corporate Change, vol.16, issue.4, pp.691-791, 2007.
DOI : 10.1093/icc/dtm023

S. A. Shane, Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation, 2004.
DOI : 10.4337/9781843769828

D. S. Siegel, D. A. Waldman, L. E. Atwater, and A. N. Link, Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, vol.21, issue.1-2, pp.115-157, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2003.12.006

D. Siegel, D. Waldman, and A. Link, Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study, Research Policy, vol.32, issue.1, pp.27-48, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00196-2

P. Sieger, T. Zellweger, and K. F. Aquino, Turning Agents into Psychological Principals: Aligning Interests of Non-Owners through Psychological Ownership, Journal of Management Studies, vol.90, issue.3, pp.361-88, 2013.
DOI : 10.1111/joms.12017

J. A. Sillince and A. D. Brown, Multiple organizational identities and legitimacy: The rhetoric of police websites, Human Relations, vol.17, issue.30, pp.1829-56, 2009.
DOI : 10.1177/0018726709336626

S. Slaughter and L. L. Leslie, Academic Capitalism: Politics, 1997.

E. B. Smith, Identities as Lenses: How Organizational Identity Affects Audiences' Evaluation of Organizational Performance, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.69, issue.1, pp.61-94, 2011.
DOI : 10.1086/210178

S. Sörlin, Funding Diversity: Performance-based Funding Regimes as Drivers of Differentiation in Higher Education Systems, Higher Education Policy, vol.18, issue.2, pp.413-453, 2007.
DOI : 10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300078

J. A. Starr and I. C. Macmillan, Resource cooptation via social contracting: resource acquisition strategies for new ventures, Strategic Management Journal, vol.11, pp.79-92, 1990.

T. E. Stuart and W. W. Ding, When Do Scientists Become Entrepreneurs? The Social Structural Antecedents of Commercial Activity in the Academic Life Sciences, American Journal of Sociology, vol.112, issue.1, pp.97-144, 2006.
DOI : 10.1086/502691

D. E. Stokes, Pasteur's Quadrant ? Basic Science and Technological Innovation, 1997.

A. Strauss and J. Corbin, Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 1998.

S. Stryker and P. J. Burke, The Past, Present, and Future of an Identity Theory, Social Psychology Quarterly, vol.63, issue.4, pp.284-97, 2000.
DOI : 10.2307/2695840

M. Suchman, Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches, Academy of Management Review, vol.20, pp.571-611, 1995.
DOI : 10.2307/258788

R. Suddaby and R. Greenwood, Rhetorical Strategies of Legitimacy, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.50, issue.1, pp.35-67, 2005.
DOI : 10.2189/asqu.2005.50.1.35

P. M. Swamidass and V. Vulasa, Why university inventions rarely produce income? Bottlenecks in university technology transfer, The Journal of Technology Transfer, vol.57, issue.1, pp.343-63, 2009.
DOI : 10.1007/s10961-008-9097-8

V. Tartari, A. Salter, and P. D-'este, Crossing the Rubicon: exploring the factors that shape academics' perceptions of the barriers to working with industry, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol.36, issue.3, pp.655-77, 2012.
DOI : 10.1093/cje/bes007

V. Tartari, M. Perkmann, and A. Salter, In good company: the influence of peers on industry engagement by academic scientists, Research Policy, vol.23, pp.1189-203, 2014.

T. Thune and M. Gulbrandsen, Institutionalization of university???industry interaction: an empirical study of the impact of formal structures on collaboration patterns, Science and Public Policy, vol.38, issue.2, pp.99-107, 2011.
DOI : 10.3152/030234211X12924093660110

G. Thursby and M. Thursby, University licensing under Baye-Dohl: what are the issues and evidence? Working paper, 2003.

A. A. Toole and D. Czarnitzki, Commercializing Science: Is There a University ???Brain Drain??? from Academic Entrepreneurship?, Management Science, vol.56, issue.9, pp.1599-614, 2010.
DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.1100.1192

J. C. Turner, Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory, 1987.

N. Van-gestel and B. Hillebrand, Explaining Stability and Change: The Rise and Fall of Logics in Pluralistic Fields, Organization Studies, vol.45, issue.1, pp.231-52, 2011.
DOI : 10.1177/0170840610397475

D. Vora and T. Kostova, A model of dual organizational identification in the context of the multinational enterprise, Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol.47, issue.3, pp.327-50, 2007.
DOI : 10.1002/job.422

D. A. Whetten, Albert and Whetten Revisited: Strengthening the Concept of Organizational Identity, Journal of Management Inquiry, vol.15, issue.3, pp.219-253, 2006.
DOI : 10.1177/1056492606291200

R. K. Yin, Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2009.

Y. Zhang, J. A. George, and T. S. Chan, The Paradox of Dueling Identities: The Case of Local Senior Executives in MNC Subsidiaries, Journal of Management, vol.15, issue.4, pp.400-425, 2006.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.493

M. Zimmerman and G. Zeitz, Beyond survival: achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy, Academy of Management Review, vol.27, pp.414-445, 2002.

C. Zott and Q. N. Huy, How Entrepreneurs Use Symbolic Management to Acquire Resources, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.52, issue.1, pp.70-105, 2007.
DOI : 10.2189/asqu.52.1.70

E. W. Zuckerman, The Categorical Imperative: Securities Analysts and the Illegitimacy Discount, American Journal of Sociology, vol.104, issue.5, pp.1398-438, 1999.
DOI : 10.1086/210178