T. Andersson, Managing a systems approach to technology and innovation policy, STI Review, vol.22, pp.10-28, 1998.

R. Blair, Policy Tools Theory and Implementation Networks: Understanding State Enterprise Zone Partnerships, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol.12, issue.2, pp.161-190, 2002.
DOI : 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003528

URL : http://jpart.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/12/2/161

B. Freitas and I. M. , Diffusion of quality and management capabilities in France and in the UK. Unpublished PhD Thesis, 2006.

H. T. Bressers and L. J. O-'toole, The Selection of Policy Instruments: a Network-based Perspective, Journal of Public Policy, vol.18, issue.3, pp.213-239, 1998.
DOI : 10.1017/S0143814X98000117

K. Brown, Small businesses voice concern over red tape: survey only 8 per cent happy with support services, Financial Times, 2000.

M. Callon, J. P. Courtial, P. Crance, P. Laredo, P. Mauguin et al., Tools for the evaluation of technological programmes: An account of work done at the centre for the sociology of innovation, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, vol.3, issue.1, pp.3-41, 1991.
DOI : 10.1080/09537329108524030

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00271614

M. Callon, P. Laredo, and V. Rabeharisoa, Des instruments pour la gestion et l'évaluation des programmes technologiques: le cas de L'AFME, L'Évaluation Économique de la Recherche et du Changement Technique, 1991.

K. Campbell, New vision for Business Links, Financial Times, 1997.

U. Cantner and A. Pyka, Classifying technology policy from an evolutionary perspective, Research Policy, vol.30, issue.5, pp.759-775, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00104-9

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=

J. M. Cortina, What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications., Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.78, issue.1, pp.96-104, 1993.
DOI : 10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98

R. Cowan and D. Foray, The Economics of Codification and the Diffusion of Knowledge, Industrial and Corporate Change, vol.6, issue.3, pp.595-622, 1997.
DOI : 10.1093/icc/6.3.595

P. A. David and D. Foray, Information Distribution and the Growth of Economically Valuable Knowledge: A Rationale for Technological Infrastructure Policies, Technological Infrastructure Policy: an international perspective. Kluwer Academic, 1996.
DOI : 10.1007/978-94-015-8739-6_4

H. Ergas, The importance of technology policy Economic Policy and Technological Performance, 1987.

D. Foray and P. Llerena, Information structure and coordination in technology policy, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, vol.31, issue.2, pp.157-173, 1996.
DOI : 10.1007/BF01202592

A. T. Furtado, S. B. Suslick, N. M. Pereira, A. G. Freitas, and L. Bach, Assessment of direct and indirect effects of large technological programmes: Petrobras Deepwater Programme in Brazil, Research Evaluation, vol.8, issue.3, pp.155-163, 1999.
DOI : 10.3152/147154499781777496

G. Garofoli and B. Musyck, Innovation policies for SMEs in Europe: towards an interactive model? Regional Studies, pp.869-872, 2001.

M. Goldman, H. Ergas, E. Ralph, and G. Felker, Technology institutions and policies, their role in developing technological capability in industry, 1997.

W. G. Jacoby and S. K. Schneider, Variability in State Policy Priorities: An Empirical Analysis, The Journal of Politics, vol.63, issue.2, pp.544-568, 2001.
DOI : 10.1111/0022-3816.00078

M. Justman and M. Teubal, Technological infrastructure policy (TIP): Creating capabilities and building markets, Technological Infrastructure Policy: an international perspective. Kluwer Academic, 1996.
DOI : 10.1016/0048-7333(93)00765-L

J. Kooiman, Modern Governance, 1993.

S. Lall and M. Teubal, ???Market-stimulating??? technology policies in developing countries: A framework with examples from East Asia, World Development, vol.26, issue.8, pp.1369-1385, 1998.
DOI : 10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00071-0

M. T. Larsen and N. Von-tunzelmann, When non-markets fail: the role of public science in the development of generic technology. Paper for DRUID-DIME Academy Winter Conference, 2006.

J. Levet, Les aides publiques aux entreprises: une gouvernance, une stratégie. Commissariat général du Plan, 2003.

R. G. Lipsey and K. Carlaw, Technology policies in neo-classical and structuralist? evolutionary models. STI Review 22, Special Issue on 'New Rationale and Approaches in Technology and Innovation Policy, 1997.

P. Marini, Rapport général sur le projet de loi de finances pour 2002, tome III -Les moyens des services et les dispositions spéciales (deuxième partie de la loi de finances, Sénat, nº 86 Annexe 12 -Industrie et nº 87 Annexe 13, Petites et moyennes entreprises, 2001.

J. S. Metcalfe, Institutions and Progress, Industrial and Corporate Change, vol.10, issue.3, pp.561-586, 2001.
DOI : 10.1093/icc/10.3.561

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=

J. S. Metcalfe and L. Georghiou, Equilibrium and evolutionary foundations of technology policy. STI Review 22, Special Issue on 'New Rationale and Approaches in Technology and Innovation Policy, pp.75-100, 1998.

J. S. Metcalfe and R. Ramlogan, Competition and the regulation of economic development, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, vol.45, issue.2-3, pp.215-235, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.qref.2005.01.001

R. A. Musgrave, The Theory of Public Finance, 1959.

L. K. Mytelka and K. Smith, Policy learning and innovation theory: an interactive and coevolving process, Research Policy, vol.3189, pp.1467-1479, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00076-8

F. Najmabadi and S. Lall, Developing industrial technology, lessons for policy and practice, 1995.

O. 'toole and L. J. , Policy Recommendations for Multi-Actor Implementation: An Assessment of the Field, Journal of Public Policy, vol.48, issue.02, pp.181-210, 1986.
DOI : 10.1177/009539978501600402

P. and C. E. Consultants, Evaluation of DTI-funded TEC Services, 1995.

B. G. Peters, Policy Instruments and Public Management: Bridging the Gaps, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol.10, issue.1, pp.35-47, 2000.
DOI : 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024265

P. Sabatier, Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches to Implementation Research: a Critical Analysis and Suggested Synthesis, Journal of Public Policy, vol.5, issue.01, pp.21-48, 1986.
DOI : 10.1016/0305-0483(80)90019-5

A. Schneider and H. Ingram, Behavioral Assumptions of Policy Tools, The Journal of Politics, vol.52, issue.2, pp.510-529, 1990.
DOI : 10.2307/2131904

A. Schneider and H. Ingram, Systematically Pinching Ideas: A Comparative Approach to Policy Design, Journal of Public Policy, vol.4, issue.01, pp.61-80, 1988.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1986.tb00425.x

M. Teubal and E. Andersen, Enterprise restructuring and embeddedness: a policy and systems perspective, Industrial and Corporate Change, vol.9, issue.1, pp.87-111, 2000.
DOI : 10.1093/icc/9.1.87

URL : http://icc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/9/1/87

N. Von-tunzelmann, Historical coevolution of governance and technology in the industrial revolutions, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, vol.14, issue.4, pp.365-384, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S0954-349X(03)00029-8

P. Wegloop, Linking firm strategy and government action: Towards a resource-based perspective on innovation and technology policy, Technology in Society, vol.17, issue.4, pp.413-428, 1995.
DOI : 10.1016/0160-791X(95)00017-L