Recognition, Reification, and Practices of Forgetting: Ethical Implications of Human Resource Management - Grenoble École de management Access content directly
Journal Articles Journal of Business Ethics Year : 2012

Recognition, Reification, and Practices of Forgetting: Ethical Implications of Human Resource Management

Abstract

This article examines the ethical framing of employment in contemporary human resource management (HRM). Using Axel Honneth's theory of recognition and classical critical notions of reification, I contrast recognition and reifying stances on labor. The recognition approach embeds work in its emotive and social particu-larity, positively affirming the basic dignity of social actors. Reifying views, by contrast, exhibit a forgetfulness of recognition, removing action from its existential and social moorings, and imagining workers as bundles of discrete resources or capacities. After discussing why reification is a problem, I stress that recognition and reifi-cation embody different ethical standpoints with regards to organizational practices. Thus, I argue paradoxically that many current HRM best practices can be maintained while cultivating an attitude of recognition. If reification is a type of forgetting, cultivating a recognition attitude involves processes of ''remembering'' to foster work relations that reinforce employee dignity.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
Islam 2012 (Recognition, Reification, and Practices of Forgetting_ Ethical Implications of Human Resource Management wp)-1.pdf (170.1 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin : Files produced by the author(s)
Loading...

Dates and versions

hal-01232667 , version 1 (07-12-2016)

Identifiers

Cite

Gazi Islam. Recognition, Reification, and Practices of Forgetting: Ethical Implications of Human Resource Management. Journal of Business Ethics, 2012, ⟨10.1007/s10551-012-1433-0⟩. ⟨hal-01232667⟩

Collections

GRENOBLE-EM
187 View
859 Download

Altmetric

Share

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More